Gulf news by Joseph A. Kechichian, Beirut: For nearly a century, academic works touted the analysis that
Western powers “created artificial nations” in the Eastern
Mediterranean, allegedly because Syria, Lebanon and Palestine were
deprived of historical legacies.
For just as long, Arab
nationalists and Islamists alike focused on the “Sykes-Picot order”, and
argued that the time was long overdue to erase the 1916 accord among
two leading colonial powers that divided the region to serve their
narrow interests.
Beyond simplified analyses, critical assessments
of the agreement overlooked the notion that Lebanon (as well as Syria
and Palestine) were not “artificial creations” but, on the contrary,
benefited from the deal to join the nation-state system, still the most
successful business model that functioned, protected citizens, and
allowed for the creation of wealth even if the major powers sought to
protect oil resources and communication lines.