Khazen

By Phyllis Chesler

Shouldn’t we first help the Christian victims of Mideast genocide?

Before dawn Monday, four suicide bombers killed five and wounded at
least a dozen in the Lebanese Christian town of al-Qaa. Later that
night, as townspeople prepared to bury their dead, four more suicide
bombers hit.

The attacks underscored just how endangered are Christians who live
in today’s Muslim world. As the United States debates how many Mideast
refugees to accept and who should get priority, the answer is staring us
in the face: Those most in need of refuge are Christians and Yazidis
who live among Muslims.

On June 19, a suicide bomber killed three people as he detonated
himself at a memorial to massacred Christians in Qumishi, Syria. On June
9, a Pakistani Muslim mob badly beat a man merely because he was a
Christian. On June 5, two people were killed when Islamists targeted a
church with rockets in Syria; the same day, a Christian man was hacked
to death at his shop by Islamists in Bangladesh. On June 2, in Nigeria,
Muslim youths beheaded a Christian woman for allegedly insulting
Mohammed.

And that’s just this month — a typical month, sadly, for the world’s Christians.

In May, similar Muslim attacks against Christians took place in
Niger, Turkey, Syria, the Philippines, Uganda, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
On March 27-28, a Taliban group murdered 69 Christians and wounded 30
more, mainly women and children, as they were celebrating Easter in a
park in Lahore, Pakistan.

The list goes on.

Yet President Obama seems to value endangered Muslim lives more than the lives of endangered Christians and Yazidis.

In April, America built a temporary “surge” center in Amman, Jordan,
to more rapidly process Muslim immigrants from Syria. The vetting
process has been “fast tracked,” perhaps in order to meet Obama’s
desired number of 10,000 Muslim Syrians to be admitted by September.

The Obama administration has called for an openhearted and massive
acceptance of Muslim refugees from war zones. Democratic leaders insist
that it would be wrong, morally, legally and politically, to stop Muslim
immigration — but concede that it’s currently impossible to identify
would-be jihadists among refugees or homegrown radicals among their
descendants.

The United Nations has more modestly suggested that Western nations accept Muslim “women and children” first.

Obama has paid no attention to what has happened in Europe, namely
the large number of sexual assaults of girls, women and homosexuals by
Muslim men, as well as the staggering financial cost of hosting hostile,
non-productive immigrants who may have no desire to assimilate to
Western customs.

Here’s another suggestion.

If we want to accept refugees in flight from Arab and Muslim war
zones, why not start with Christians who are being slaughtered by
Muslims in Muslim-majority countries? Although they’re Arabs, Africans
or Central Asians, the fact that they’re also Christians might make them
more inclined to assimilate to Western ways — and, even if they
assimilate imperfectly, they’re more likely to respond to Western
freedoms in nonviolent ways.

Why has the pope offered symbolic asylum in the Vatican only to Muslims and not to fellow Christians?

Recently, according to my colleague Ashraf Rameleh, a Coptic
Christian advocate, “Pope Francis, who is ‘building bridges to build
peace’ around the world, has naturally reached out to embrace Sunni
Muslims.” Rameleh notes that the pope has “grieved with the Orthodox of
Egypt and offered his prayers over the spilled blood of Christians in
Libya, recognizing the Coptic Christian martyrs.”

However, the pope has remained silent about the systematic
destruction of the Eastern Christian Church. He hasn’t supported
Egyptian President Abdel Fatta el-Sisi, who is trying to break the
stranglehold that the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood still has on Egypt.

I have been told by the director of the Hatune Dogan Foundation, Hans
Erling Jensen, that Christians stuck in refugee camps in Turkey have
arrived penniless; that Muslims don’t look out for them but, instead,
continue to persecute them. Most are starving. Many don’t have money to
buy food or to pay traffickers to smuggle them out.

Why not bring Christians and Yazidis from the Muslim world here
first? Why not bring Muslim dissidents, ex-Muslims, and Muslim
homosexuals here second?

Finally, why not bring Muslim girls and women who are already in
flight from honor-based violence, including from honor killing here,
next — before we extend visas, green cards and asylum to Muslim boys and
men?

Phyllis Chesler is emerita professor of psychology and women’s
studies at the College of Staten Island and a fellow at the Middle East
Forum.