by reuters — Lebanon’s prime minister said on Wednesday the government had not interfered with the judiciary’s work, after reports that he had put pressure on a judge who is seeking data from banks in an investigation into the conduct of the central bank governor. Prime Minister Najib Mikati said last month that veteran Governor Riad Salameh, who is at the center of domestic and international probes over allegations ranging from fraud to embezzlement, should stay in his job to avoid adding to problems in Lebanon as it navigates a deep financial crisis. “It is also necessary to clarify what came out yesterday (Tuesday) about matters related to the judiciary. In this context, I say it is not true that we interfered in the work of the judiciary or in any decision taken by the judiciary,” Mikati told a news conference. Al Akhbar and other Lebanese news outlets said Mikati had called Lebanon’s top prosecutor, Ghassan Oueidat, and threatened to resign if Judge Jean Tannous continued to press banks for data in his investigation. The Tannous probe is investigating allegations of embezzlement and other misconduct at the central bank involving about $300 million in gains made by a company owned by Salameh’s brother, Raja.
Oueidat did not respond to a request for comment. Reuters has been unable to reach Raja Salameh and the central bank said it did not have his contact details. Riad Salameh, who has run the bank for almost three decades, has repeatedly denied the accusations of wrongdoing being investigated by Tannous or by other Lebanese and international probes. Two sources told Reuters that members of Lebanon’s state security had visited at least two commercial banks on Tuesday as part of the Tannous investigation, seeking information on the governor’s brother. One of the sources with knowledge of one visit said the security officials initially pressed bank officials hard for data but then suddenly changed tack, softening their demands. “The security forces got friendlier and started asking general questions rather than specifics… and that’s it, and they left,” the source said, asking not to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue.