By Najia Houssari – arabnews.com — BEIRUT: Newly elected reformist MPs in Lebanon are planning strategies following election breakthroughs that grant them significant sway in the parliamentary balance of power. Thirteen reformist MPs in Lebanon who entered the legislative race on the values of the 2019 anti-establishment uprising, as well as 21 independent MPs, have entered the newly elected Lebanese Parliament. Analysts have added up MPs to figure out the size of the parliamentary blocs, which are divided between sovereign blocs and pro-Hezbollah groupings. Figures show that elected MPs may be positioned within 13 blocs divided into two opposite larger camps, forming the 128-MP Parliament.

The sovereign MPs can be classified based on their previous positions. A total of 68 MPs are opposed to Hezbollah. They include members from the Lebanese Forces Party, the Progressive Socialist Party, the Islamic Group and the Lebanese Phalanges Party, as well as independents and reformists. Meanwhile, the pro-Hezbollah camp includes the party itself, the Amal Movement, the Free Patriotic Movement, the Marada Movement, the Tashnaq Party and Al-Ahbash, for a total of about 60 MPs. There is much speculation about how the new independent MPs will deal with upcoming events, and how they will position themselves on the parliamentary map.

A political observer told Arab News: “We will see the true colors of every MP when topics related to core issues are discussed.” The observer added: “Will these MPs change their stance regarding Hezbollah’s illegal weapons, although some have avoided addressing this sensitive issue in the past? Will these MPs be able to form a unified bloc that can influence decisions within Parliament, or will they remain independent, each working alone?”

By Dale Gavlak — VOA News — AMMAN — Lebanon’s newly elected parliament begins its mandate Sunday, and one of its first acts is to elect a speaker and deputy speaker. The speaker position is held by a Shiite Muslim, and Hezbollah ally Nabih Berri has headed the parliament since 1992. Observers say reformist lawmakers and others in the new legislature see Berri as part of the long-standing problem related to corruption and Iran-backed Hezbollah influence. Observers say that it is not just the more than a dozen independents and reformists along with 19 lawmakers from the Lebanese Forces, a mainly Christian party and critic of Hezbollah and Iran, that do not want long-standing speaker Nabih Berri to keep his post. Even President Michel Aoun’s Free Patriotic Movement is against Berri’s nomination.

Habib Malik of the Lebanese American University tells VOA that this new parliament would like to see Berri, who has been around for nearly three decades, replaced by another Shiite leader. “An important milestone now will be the election of the speaker of the chamber. Nabih Berri, who has been there, is posed to want to return. There are mounting calls against him, and a lot of the new MPs will not vote for him. But here’s again where Hezbollah can play tricks and try to bring him,” he said. Dania Koleilat Khatib, with the Issam Fares Institute at the American University of Beirut, tells VOA that all the Shiite lawmakers are either from Berri’s Amal Movement political party or Hezbollah, so an independent Shiite lawmaker is unlikely. “Will they vote for Berri to become again as speaker of the parliament? They’re saying that Berri might now, just to save face — to say that he was outvoted — he will say that I will retire. He will suggest one of his people to be the speaker of the parliament. Someone, of course, that he can control 100%,” she said.

The false story published by tayyar.org about Cheikh Sari el Khazen is a typical example of a declining party that is failing in all aspects of national and political life. They are desperate to portray themselves as “victims” to generate new support. Their fabrication about Cheikh Sari el Khazen article and photoshops is both a […]

NNA – Head of the “Democratic Gathering” parliamentary bloc, MP Taymour Jumblatt, stressed today on “the continued struggle for Lebanon’s sovereignty to protect the state, our independent national decision, and our normal relations with the brotherly Arab countries.” “The elections are a new juncture that proves Lebanon’s democratic identity and diversity that many have tried […]

By Rawaa Talass — arabnews.com — DUBAI: For many Lebanese, the past can be a painful subject. A civil war destroyed large swaths of the country between 1975 and 1990. The postwar period has been marked by sectarian strife and government dysfunction. But in spite of the traumas of recent decades, Lebanon remains a land of immense cultural wealth, with a rich history reflected in its architectural, cultural and anthropological heritage. This is why the Beirut Museum of Art, or BeMA, which is due to open in 2026, has been billed as a “beacon of hope” in a country beset by political paralysis, economic decline and a worsening humanitarian crisis.

When Sandra Abou Nader and Rita Nammour launched the museum project, their goal was to showcase the wide diversity of Lebanese art and provide facilities for education, digitization, restoration, storage and artist-in-residency programs. “They realized that there was, in fact, very little visibility for the Lebanese artistic scene, within the country and abroad, and for Lebanese artists, whether modern or contemporary,” BeMA’s art consultant, Juliana Khalaf, told Arab News. About 700 works of art will be on display at the new venue, drawn from the Lebanese Ministry of Culture’s collection of more than 2,000 pieces, the bulk of which have been in storage for decades. “We are going to be housing this very important collection,” said Khalaf. “We call it the national collection and it belongs to the public. It’s our role to make it, for the very first time, accessible. It’s never been seen before.”

(Reuters) By Maya Gebeily, Timour Azhari and Laila Bassam – Lebanon’s government foresees cancelling “a large part” of the central bank’s foreign currency obligations to commercial banks and dissolving non-viable banks by November, according to a financial recovery plan passed by the Cabinet on Friday. The document, seen by Reuters and verified as accurate by a minister, was passed by the Cabinet in its final session hours before losing decision-making powers, following the election of a new parliament on May 15.

It includes several measures that are prerequisites to unlock funds from a preliminary deal with the International Monetary Fund agreed in April that could help pull the country out of a three-year financial meltdown. Deputy Prime Minister Saade Chami said approval of the plan was a “step forward” but that Lebanon’s newly-elected parliament must “quickly” adopt a number of the IMF prior actions, such as amendments to banking secrecy regulations and a capital controls bill that lawmakers have repeatedly failed to endorse. “We can put things on paper but we have to ensure whatever we committed to is being executed in the future,” Chami said. “I cannot predict whether they will do it or not, whether there is a political will to do it.”

By Nada Homsi — .thenationalnews.com — The Lebanese Forces say it is the largest Christian party in parliament for the first time — but they are not the only ones to make the claim. Their rivals, the Hezbollah-allied Free Patriotic Movement, have long been the largest Christian bloc and say they retained the majority. The competing claims appear to set the battle lines ahead of the presidential election in October when MPs have the often contentious vote for Lebanon’s highest-ranking Christian official. Although alliances will likely shift and settle once the new parliament convenes and begins its work, the electoral results show a lead for the Lebanese Forces, who scored 22 seats to the Free Patriotic Movement’s 18. Ultimately, it was not the startling upset the Lebanese Forces had hoped for and with only four seats separating the two parties.

More broadly, the picture is repeated. The pro-Hezbollah parties, including Free Patriotic Movement, scored 59 seats — five short of a majority in the 128 seat cross-confessional parliament. While the pro-Hezbollah faction is a generally cohesive alliance, the groups that now make up the majority of seats are an array of parties like the Lebanese Forces, smaller factions, independents and the emerging opposition groups who gained 13 seats who have no such consensus of views.

Bassil claims Free Patriotic Movement still top

Despite the numbers appearing to show the Lebanese Forces’ marginal lead among Christian parties — and its party head Samir Geagea declaring the victory — Free Patriotic Movement head Gebran Bassil also said they had remained the largest Christian bloc. However, he said there were more important things to work on than squabbling about winners and losers. “The truth is that today is not the time to flex about who has the majority,” he said. “It’s time to work hard and get results to fix the country.” While the Iran-backed Hezbollah and its allies, of which the Free Patriotic Movement is a major partner, suffered losses compared to the 2018 elections, the most startling development was the unprecedented 12 seats won by civil society opposition groups.

Lebanon election results 2022 in full: which candidates and parties won?

by business-standard.com — A new $10 million grant will help Lebanon mitigate the environmental and health impacts of the Beirut port explosions on the neighbouring population and support Beirut’s reconstruction, the UN said in a statement. The grant given through the Beirut Critical Environment Recovery, Restoration and Waste Management Program, was agreed on Wednesday between […]

WASHINGTON, (Reuters) – The U.S. Treasury Department on Thursday issued new Hezbollah-related sanctions, designating Lebanese businessman and the Iran-backed group’s financial facilitator, Ahmad Jalal Reda Abdallah, and his companies. Abdallah, five of his associates and eight of his companies in Lebanon and Iraq were sanctioned and added to the sanctions list of the U.S. Treasury […]

@AzziSejean

رَبِـحْتم، ربِّـحوا البلد. خَسِرتُم، لا تُـخَسِّروا البلد. عظمةُ الديمقراطيّةِ أنّها تساوي في المسؤوليّةِ الرابِـحين والخاسِرين. للأوّلين تَقول الديمقراطيّةُ: “كونوا متواضِعين في انتصارِكم وحُكْمِكم”، وللآخرين: “كونوا نبلاءَ في خَسارتِكم ومعارضَتِكم”. لحظةُ الانتصارِ أربعٌ وعشرون ساعةً تتبدّدُ بعد النشوة، ولحظةُ المسؤوليّةِ أربعُ سنواتٍ تبقى للمحاسَبةِ أربعينَ سنة. لا تَبحثوا عن الأكثريّةِ الفعليّةِ في المجلسِ النيابي، فهي موجودةٌ في مكانٍ آخَر، في الّذين قاطَعوا الانتخابات.

الفائزون والخاسرون في انتخاباتِ 15 أيار يُمثّلون معًا نحو 41% فقط من الشعب، بينما المقاطعون يُمثّلون وَحدَهم نحو 59%. لكنَّ دورَ المجلسِ النيابيِّ الجديدِ ــــ وهو كاملُ الشرعيّة ــــ أن يُجسِّدَ صوتَ المقترِعين وصوتَ المقاطِعين لأنَّ المقاطعةَ هي صوتٌ مُمتَنعٌ. المقترِعون والمقاطِعون يَنتمون إلى الاتّجاهاتِ السياسيّةِ ذاتِها. طرفٌ فَضَّلَ التعبيرَ عن موقفِه اقتراعًا وآخَرُ ارْتأى التعبيرَ عنه امتناعًا. ليس هذا الواقعُ سِمةَ الحياةِ السياسيّةِ اللبنانيّةِ وحدها، فهو يَنتشرُ في غالِبيّةِ الديمقراطيّاتِ الذابِلةِ حيث الشعوبُ لا تأمَلُ جديدًا من أنظمتِها.