Lebanese army ‘taking all measures’ against terror threat at Syrian border

by NAJIA AL-HOUSSARI | Special to Arab News  BEIRUT: The Lebanese army is taking “all necessary measures” to protect towns near the border with Syria from terrorists operating in the area, the commander of the country’s armed forces has said. Army Commander Gen. Joseph Aoun on Wednesday inspected the military forces in the areas around Jaroud Arsal.  The barren area in the mountains between Syria and Lebanon has been a base of operations for insurgents fighting in the Syrian civil war, including members of Daesh and the group formerly known as Al-Nusra Front. Aoun stressed the need to take “all necessary measures to protect border towns and villages and ensure the safety of their residents against any terrorist violations.”  He confirmed the army’s ability and determination to deter terrorist organizations, stressing that the army “was able to protect Lebanon in its most difficult situations, and would continue doing so regardless of the price… We don’t listen to all critical voices that want to jeopardize our ability to do our sacred role.”

The local mayor released a statement calling upon “Syrians in camps around the area… to stick to their tents and houses in cases of emergency, and not appear armed in any case. Otherwise, they will be held accountable.” Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Al-Hariri said on Tuesday that the army would carry out an operation in the border area. Speaking in the Parliament, Al-Hariri described the operation planned for Jaroud Arsal as carefully studied, the National News Agency reported. The government had given the army the “freedom” to act, he added. Syrian regime warplanes have been intensifying strikes in the area, local residents said. Abu Omar, one of the residents, said: “This is the first time the hits take place in the morning and evening, indicating that the battle Hezbollah wants to wage against the Syrian militants in Arsal ... is approaching.”

Lebanon enacts laws to raise taxes for funding wage scale

BEIRUT, July 19 (Xinhua) -- After passing the public sector's salary scale bill on Tuesday, the Lebanese parliament approved on Wednesday a series of laws that raise taxes to secure revenues for funding the wage scale. The house, in the second legislative session, approved a 7 percent tax rate on bank's profits, along with an imposed fine on maritime public property. The parliament also approved charging a fee of 5,000 Lebanon Pound (3.3 U.S. dollars) for non-Lebanese citizens upon their entry into the country, cancelled fees on economy travel tickets and kept the current fee at a price of 60,000 Lebanon Pound (40 U.S. dollars). Meanwhile, activists from the civil society, Kataeb party and former members of Armed Forces rallied near the parliament protesting against the tax hike.

Addiction and intrigue: Inside the Saudi palace coup

This article does not represent the opinion of khazen.org -

(Reuters) - On Tuesday June 21 Mohammed bin Nayef, a powerful figure in Saudi Arabia's security apparatus for the past two decades and the next in line to the throne, was summoned to meet King Salman bin Abdulaziz on the fourth floor of the royal palace in Mecca. There, according to a source close to MbN, as he is known, the king ordered him to step aside in favor of the king's favorite son, Mohammed bin Salman. The reason: an addiction to painkilling drugs was clouding MbN's judgment. "The king came to meet MbN and they were alone in the room. He told him: 'I want you to step down, you didn't listen to the advice to get treatment for your addiction which dangerously affects your decisions'," said the source close to MbN.

The new details about the extraordinary meeting between the king and MbN that touched off the de facto palace coup help to explain the events that are reshaping the leadership of the world's biggest oil exporting nation. Reuters could not independently confirm MbN's addiction issues. Palace officials declined to respond to detailed questions about the circumstances surrounding MbN's overthrow. Sources with knowledge of the situation said however that the king was determined to elevate his son to be heir to the throne and used MbN's drug problem as a pretext to push him aside. Three royal insiders, four Arab officials with links to the ruling house of Saud, and diplomats in the region, told Reuters that MbN was surprised to be ordered to step aside. "It was a big shock to MbN," said a Saudi political source close to MbN. "It was a coup. He wasn't prepared." The sources said MbN did not expect to be usurped by the often impulsive Mohammed bin Salman, who MbN considered to have made a number of policy blunders, such as his handling of the Yemen conflict and cutting financial benefits to civil servants.

The high-stakes power grab has placed sweeping powers in the hands of the 32-year-old Mohammed bin Salman, also known as MbS, and appears designed to speed his accession to the throne. Should he get the job, the young prince will preside over a kingdom facing tough times from depressed oil prices, the conflict in Yemen, rivalry with an emboldened Iran and a major diplomatic crisis in the Gulf. The source close to MbN acknowledged that he had health issues, which were aggravated after an al Qaeda attacker tried to blow himself up in front of him in his palace in 2009. The health issues were corroborated by three other sources in Saudi Arabia and Arab official sources with links to the royal family. An Arab source with close Saudi links also provided a similar account of the meeting at which King Salman asked MbN to step down because of his alleged drug addiction. These sources said MbN had shrapnel in his body that could not be removed and he depended on drugs such as morphine to alleviate the pain. One source said MbN had been treated in clinics in Switzerland on three occasions in recent years. Reuters was unable to confirm this independently.

Read more ...

yrian cease-fire a delicate balance of vastly different goals

by Al Monitor - Hamidreza Azizi

As various international peace initiatives have sought a political solution to the Syrian crisis, the most recent tangible breakthrough came from someplace new. On July 9, the long-awaited meeting between the presidents of Russia and the United States took place on the sidelines of the G-20 summit in Hamburg, Germany, where the two sides reaffirmed a recently reached cease-fire for southern Syria. A day after the meeting, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Russia will continue cooperating with the United States on the de-escalation zones in southern Syria. He further pointed out that Russia, the United States and Jordan will establish a center in Amman to coordinate all the details of the zones. The very fact that the US-Russian truce initiative has survived its first week of implementation suggests that this time the two major powers have more incentive to cooperate on their areas of shared interests regardless of how partial and non-inclusive they could be. The significance of the recent cease-fire agreement becomes clearer given the latest round of negotiations being brokered by Iran, Russia and Turkey in Astana, Kazakhstan. The July 4-5 gathering stopped short of reaching an agreement, as Ankara reportedly objected to some details of the de-escalation zones. At the same time, the other main international peace initiative on Syria, namely the UN Geneva talks held July 10, has also failed to make a real breakthrough. Those talks did not even manage to bring representatives of the Syrian government and the opposition to the same table for direct negotiations.

So why is the US-Russian truce agreement in southern Syria experiencing a successful start when other recent initiatives have yet to achieve consensus on basic issues? To answer this query, one must consider the role Russia seeks to play in Syria. Generally speaking, it seems Russia has been trying to reach a series of bilateral and multilateral working structures with the various parties involved, with Moscow as the main actor in all those structures. On one hand, it has invested heavily in the Astana talks, and by doing so it has managed to effectively sideline the Geneva process and replace it with a Moscow-centered peace initiative.

Moscow has so far tried to build on its fundamental shared interests with Tehran and Ankara — for example, pushing for a political transition plan in Syria while preserving a minimum level of influence for each of the three parties in areas they deem vital for their national interests. But Russia also faces the task of bringing Iran and Turkey to a wider compromise on their long-term interests in Syria; this goal is difficult mainly because Iran prioritizes the defeat of all terrorist and armed rebel groups over the start of a political transition while Turkey wants to use the rebels it supports and the territories they have under their control as a bargaining chip in any future political talks. Although Turkey was the main obstacle to an agreement at the latest talks in Astana, Russia seems willing to keep bargaining to gain Ankara’s cooperation by giving it some points in northern Syria, an area vital for Turkey because of its concerns over the growing role of Kurdish groups. At the same time, by declaring that Tehran will host the next meeting of the Astana working group in early August, Moscow tried not to alienate Iran and to keep it active in the Astana talks.

Meanwhile, the Syrian truce agreement reached by Russia and the United States could be viewed as Moscow's attempt to prevent any further escalation with Washington and its allies. Syria has, in effect, been divided into different zones of influence between the regional and global powers, and Moscow has shown willingness to recognize the US zone of influence in southern Syria. Displaying a softer stance in the south is also vital for Moscow to preserve its good relations with Israel. Thus, Russia is additionally trying to ease Israel’s concerns over the presence of pro-Iran groups near its borders. All in all, it seems Russia has taken the first step toward recognizing different zones of influence in Syria. To Moscow, the key objective here is to prevent any escalation that could potentially lead to its further involvement in the Syrian crisis. At the same time, these various sets of agreements could potentially introduce Moscow as the real peace broker in Syria.

Read more ...

China Censors Winnie The Pooh Because of Comparisons To President Xi

by Faith Gates - mediaite

The classic, lovable bear is being blocked from Chinese social media sites because bloggers have been comparing Winnie the Pooh to their President Xi Jinping. The censoring happened over the weekend on the very popular sites WeChat and Weibo when bloggers kept posting side by sides photos of the Hundred Acre characters and Chinese leaders, mainly President Xi. The pictures reportedly started back in 2013 and included some of President Xi and President Obama as Pooh and Tigger, Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Xi as Eeyore and Pooh, and one with Xi popping his head out of a car being compared to the kids toy with Pooh doing the same. Not only was the name “Winnie the Pooh” censored, but so were the photos, with the previous ones being taken down. According to BBC, the censoring is not just to protect the president. “It is not only that China’s censors will not tolerate ridicule of the country’s leader, they do not want this beloved children’s character becoming a kind of online euphemism for the Communist Party’s general secretary,” the article said. The article said that the Chinese have been being censored since their last leader, and it is not easy to get around the censors. It is not new for foreign leaders to be compared to fictional characters, like when Russian leader Vladimir Putin was compared to Dobby from Harry Potters or the British Prime Minister Theresa May was said to look like Cruella de Vil, without even getting into every character or thing President Donald Trump has been compared to.

Rumours of Fairouz plan to attend Damascus Fair angers Syrian opposition

by Gulfnews - Sami Moubayed, Correspondent - Beirut: The Syrian government has extended an official invitation to iconic Lebanese diva Fairouz, to perform at the 59th Damascus International Fair scheduled for August 17 to 26, 2017. An ongoing and highly celebrated event since 1954, the Damascus Fair has always been a high-profile event in the Syrian capital, famed for the active commercial participation of countries from around the world and for the regular appearance of Arab celebrities like Fairouz and Egyptian icon Umm Kalthoum. For seven years now, however, the fair has been suspended, due to the ongoing conflict in Syria. Damascus officialdom insists on coming back loudly this year, and sees a Fairouz comeback as tailor-made to fit the image it is trying to peddle through the media, that the country is recovering and that the war in Syria is coming to an end. Damascus Fair was suspended for 7 years.

Ordinary Syrians from both sides of the conflict strongly associate Fairouz with the Damascus Fair, where she was a regular guest in the 1950s and 1960s. Generation after another attended her concerts and plays on the fairgrounds in central Damascus, facing the present Four Seasons Hotel, linking the city’s two main roundabouts, Marjeh Square and Umayyad Square. Postal stamps carrying her image were issued during her performances, and fan clubs, known as “Fairouzioun” mushroomed in different towns and cities. She was always received with red carpets by a long assortment of Syrian presidents, starting with Nazem Al Qudsi back in 1962. She boycotted Syria for years during the Lebanese Civil War, objecting to the country’s military presence in her country, and only made a comeback in 2008, two years after the Syrian Army withdrew from Lebanon. After outbreak of the present conflict in 2011, she enraged her Syrian fans from the opposition camp when her son and composer, Ziad Rahbany, said that she was an admirer of Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah. Fairouz did not deny the comments.

Residents of Damascus are very excited about the news, with one college student at the Faculty of Law telling Gulf News: “It would be a dream to see Fairouz performing again in Damascus. She is a pillar of our collective memories in Syria — a reminder of the good old days. Our parents watched Fairouz many times; we didn’t, and want the chance to see her before she retires. It is our right as Fairouz fans. We cannot go to Lebanon to attend her concerts; it is way too expensive for us. We want to see her right here in Damascus. This has nothing to do with politics.

Read more ...