by Eliza Relman – business insider – Article represent opinion of author
It took nearly 20 years for Roger Stone to realize his dream. Since the 1980s, the self-described “dirty
trickster” who’s been in and around Republican politics for
half a century, had made it something of a mission to make Donald
Trump president. Despite parting ways with the Trump campaign in August 2015 —
Trump
says he fired Stone for hogging the media spotlight;
Stone says he quit because Trump attacked Megyn Kelly — Stone
has remained one of Trump’s most loyal true believers. And it’s
Stone’s communications with a Russian hacker and his alleged
communications with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange that have
put him in the crosshairs of the FBI as investigators look for
connections between Trump’s campaign and Russian meddling in the
2016 election. Stone says he has nothing to do with Russia, but messages he has
sent to the hacker accused of a cyberattack on the Democratic
National Committee, as well as Stone’s own provocative
statements, continue to
raise questions. “It’s rare that I’m accused of something that I’m not guilty of,”
Stone told the New Yorker in 2008. Now it’s up to investigators
to test that.
Stone and the Russians
On August 12, nearly a year after he left Trump’s campaign and a
few weeks after WikiLeaks published the first set of stolen
emails from the DNC, Stone reached out through a private message
to a Twitter user named “Guccifer 2.0.” Earlier that August, Stone had written on the alt-right website
Breitbart, then controlled by Steve Bannon, that it was “a
hacker who goes by the name of Guccifer 2.0” — and not the
Russians — who hacked the DNC and fed the documents to WikiLeaks. But experts quickly linked Guccifer 2.0 back to Russia and
concluded that the so-called hacker was
the product of a Russian disinformation campaign. In his messages with Guccifer 2.0, Stone asked if the hacker
could retweet his Breitbart column about the 2016 presidential
election possibly being “rigged.” Guccifer 2.0 responded: “i’m pleased to say that u r great man.
please tell me if i can help u anyhow. it would be a great
pleasure to me.” Stone
later told Business Insider that the interaction he had with
the hacker was so “brief and banal” that he “had forgotten it. “Not exactly 007 stuff even if Gruccifer [sic] 2.0 was working
for the Russkies,” Stone said. “Meaningless.” Stone’s tweets in the days after his communications with Guccifer
2.0 have raised questions about whether he knew in advance that
Podesta’s emails would be imminently published by WikiLeaks.









