by Rafi Letzter
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are set to face off tonight in
the third and final presidential debate of the 2016 election.
In August, The New York Times
reported that Clinton’s campaign brought in psychology
experts to help her prepare for her first debate with Donald
Trump — which is weird, because that’s not really what
psychologists do.
Here is the relevant part of The Times’ article (emphasis mine):
“Hillary Clinton’s advisers are … seeking insights about Mr.
Trump’s deepest insecurities as they devise strategies to
needle and undermine him … at the first
presidential debate … Her team is also getting advice from
psychology experts to help create a personality
profile of Mr. Trump to gauge how he may respond to
attacks and deal with a woman as his sole adversary on the debate
stage. They are undertaking a forensic-style
analysis of Mr. Trump’s performances in the Republican
primary debates, cataloging strengths and weaknesses as well as
trigger points that caused him to lash out in
less-than-presidential ways.”
There’s not a tremendous amount of information here, but
it’s enough to work from if we want to find research relevant to
the work these psychologists (or “psychology experts”) are
reportedly doing. The strange part is that there isn’t much to
find.