In a report published by The New Arab on Feb. 10, a Hezbollah official declared Hezbollah’s plan to establish a safe zone in Qalamoun, where Syrian refugees could soon be relocated from neighboring Lebanon. The first draft
of the deal proposed 24 terms to be negotiated between Hezbollah and a
militia in Qalamoun known as Saraya Ahl al-Sham. Syrian journalist Ahmad
al-Quasir, who has been following the situation closely, recently told
Al-Monitor that Saraya Ahl al-Sham was established by local opposition
forces in 2015 and is linked to the Free Syrian Army (FSA).
Under the initial terms of the agreement, Hezbollah and Syrian regime
forces would vacate the areas of Qalamoun where Saraya Ahl al-Sham is
present. Saraya Ahl al-Sham would also create local
committees responsible for the administration and policing of their
communities. Excluded from the deal would be several Christian-majority villages
along the M-5 highway. The road, which serves as an important supply
corridor for Hezbollah linking Damascus to the group’s stronghold in Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley, would be open to traffic to and from Syria and Lebanon. The arrangement also would provide major incentives to draw refugees
back to Qalamoun. Most notably, returnees would be issued identification
documents after screening by local authorities. New papers would be
hugely beneficial to the over 70% of Syrian refugees
who no longer have valid national ID cards, without which they cannot
travel, get married or obtain legal residency in host countries.
Returnees who join Saraya Ahl al-Sham’s brigade would also be exempt
from conscription into the Syrian Arab Army even if they had previously
fled Syria to escape the draft. They could return without punishment if
they join Saraya Ahl al-Sham. Quasir said renewed discussions of safe zone initiatives along the Turkish and Jordanian borders, following the recent endorsement of the United States,
was a key motivator for the proposed deal. Quasir said Hezbollah first
submitted the draft agreement in an effort to beat the international
community to the most practical area for a Lebanese-Syrian safe zone,
thereby determining the framework for itself.
“Hezbollah is trying to establish tailored safe zones in Qalamoun so
that things would not spin out of control. In the presence of safe zones,
neither the regime nor Hezbollah would be in control. Only the
international coalition and the international organizations would be in
control. Hezbollah may be anticipating this step,” Quasir noted.
However, a source within Saraya Ahl al-Sham who spoke to Al-Monitor
on condition of anonymity in March said the group rejected several terms
of the first draft for varying reasons, including a proposed
reconciliation with a pro-regime militia.
“The agreement was put on hold because Hezbollah took the
negotiations to square one and set March 2 as a deadline for the
negotiations,” the source explained. “The terms sent by Hezbollah with
the last delegation to negotiate with Saraya Ahl al-Sham dignitaries
were refused.”
Quasir explained why the deal is now on hold. “One of the reasons the
initiative was refused is that it stipulates that Hezbollah shall have
offices in Qalamoun, that reconciliation shall be achieved and that
Syrian regime police stations and recruitment divisions shall be
established. Saraya Ahl al-Sham refused this.”
In an article from The Daily Star on Feb. 11, Hezbollah parliament member Nawwar Saheli confirmed that the deal
would also need to be approved on an international level. “It won’t be
formal until the Lebanese government contacts the Syrian government. For
now, it’s indirectly between Hezbollah and opposition groups,” said
Saheli.
While Lebanese politicians have largely ignored the issue of
repatriation, it could prove to be cause for further division within
Lebanon’s fractious government. Newly appointed Minister of State for
Refugee Affairs Mouin Merhebi denied any connection to the Hezbollah
plan and called for the group to withdraw from Syria to facilitate
refugees’ repatriation.
“We don’t have any role and we don’t support any issue about this
negotiation. It is a problem that Hezbollah went into Syria,” Merhebi
told Al-Monitor. “[Hezbollah] invaded Syria, they burned the houses and
cut the trees over there and did some massacres. Those people fled from
Syria and came to Lebanon. The main issue [is] that everybody should
call Hezbollah to return to Lebanon, so, directly, I hope that the
Syrian refugees will go back to their land and their country.”
Merhebi added that the Lebanese government would defer to United
Nations leadership with regard to any future repatriation of Syrian
refugees. “We don’t trust Hezbollah; we don’t trust the Syrian regime.
The only trustworthy party is the UN. The UN has to take action about
this issue, and we will support the UN in whatever decision it might
take.”
Given the UN’s current position against returning refugees to Syria,
Hezbollah’s relocation deal would face steep hurdles in negotiations
with the Lebanese government. UNHCR spokesperson Dana Sleiman reiterated
to Al-Monitor, “We don’t think conditions are conducive for return at
the time being.”
Syrian refugee and lawyer Ibrahim Sadek, whose name has been changed
for his safety, told Al-Monitor that most refugees hope to return to
Syria but remain skeptical of the promises on offer from Hezbollah and
the Syrian regime. “I go daily around the camps and deal with refugees.
Even the towns that were suggested and mentioned by name in this deal,
like the villages of Qalamoun — most of them [the refugees from these
towns] have security and safety concerns. There is no trust at all with
any of the guarantees offered by Hezbollah. People need real
guarantees,” said Sadek.
“What would guarantee for the refugee that the Syrian Arab Army, aka
the regime’s army, would not arrest them? What guarantees that Hezbollah
wouldn’t re-enter again and siege people in their own towns?” he asked.
